[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141022142347.GR12706@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:23:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, acme@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/20] x86: perf: intel_pt: Intel PT PMU driver
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:40PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> +/*
> + * Capabilities of Intel PT hardware, such as number of address bits or
> + * supported output schemes, are cached and exported to userspace as "caps"
> + * attribute group of pt pmu device
> + * (/sys/bus/event_source/devices/intel_pt/caps/) so that userspace can store
> + * relevant bits together with intel_pt traces.
> + */
Does it make sense to use that AUX record variable data thing for this
instead -- much like what the ARM folks wanted?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists