[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141022150712.GD15126@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:07:12 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
maria.n.dimakopoulou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] perf/x86: add cross-HT counter exclusion
infrastructure
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:34:39PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> From: Maria Dimakopoulou <maria.n.dimakopoulou@...il.com>
>
SNIP
> +struct intel_excl_cntrs *allocate_excl_cntrs(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct intel_excl_cntrs *c;
> + int i;
> +
> + c = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_excl_cntrs),
> + GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> + if (c) {
> + spin_lock_init(&c->lock);
> + for (i = 0; i < X86_PMC_IDX_MAX; i++) {
> + c->states[0].state[i] = INTEL_EXCL_UNUSED;
> + c->states[0].init_state[i] = INTEL_EXCL_UNUSED;
> +
> + c->states[1].state[i] = INTEL_EXCL_UNUSED;
> + c->states[1].init_state[i] = INTEL_EXCL_UNUSED;
'c' is allocated with kzalloc_node, seems there's no need
to re-initialize states it to zero again with INTEL_EXCL_UNUSED
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists