Somehow the two branches in __slab_alloc do the same.
Unify them.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>

Index: linux/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slub.c
+++ linux/mm/slub.c
@@ -2280,12 +2280,8 @@ redo:
 		if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_present_pages(node))
 			searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
 
-		if (unlikely(!node_match(page, searchnode))) {
-			stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
-			deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
-			c->page = NULL;
-			c->freelist = NULL;
-			goto new_slab;
+		if (unlikely(!node_match(page, searchnode)))
+			goto deactivate;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2294,12 +2290,8 @@ redo:
 	 * PFMEMALLOC but right now, we are losing the pfmemalloc
 	 * information when the page leaves the per-cpu allocator
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(!pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags))) {
-		deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
-		c->page = NULL;
-		c->freelist = NULL;
-		goto new_slab;
-	}
+	if (unlikely(!pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags)))
+		goto deactivate;
 
 	/* must check again c->freelist in case of cpu migration or IRQ */
 	freelist = c->freelist;
@@ -2328,6 +2320,11 @@ load_freelist:
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	return freelist;
 
+deactivate:
+	deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist);
+	c->page = NULL;
+	c->freelist = NULL;
+
 new_slab:
 
 	if (c->partial) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/