[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141022161155.GB27405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:11:55 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: supplementing IO accessors with 64 bit capability
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:06:23AM -0600, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org wrote:
> @@ -306,10 +324,13 @@ extern void _memset_io(volatile void __iomem *, int, size_t);
> __raw_readw(c)); __r; })
> #define readl_relaxed(c) ({ u32 __r = le32_to_cpu((__force __le32) \
> __raw_readl(c)); __r; })
> +#define readq_relaxed(c) ({ u64 __r = le64_to_cpu((__force __le64) \
> + __raw_readq(c)); __r; })
>
> #define writeb_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writeb(v,c)
> #define writew_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writew((__force u16) cpu_to_le16(v),c)
> #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c)
> +#define writeq_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writeq((__force u64) cpu_to_le64(v),c)
You should only define these if we have the corresponding __raw_ versions
too.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists