[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141022181553.GA14687@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:15:53 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, eranian@...gle.com,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, jolsa@...hat.com,
jmario@...hat.com, rfowles@...hat.com
Subject: Re: perf: Translating mmap2 ids into socket info?
Em Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:42:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:45:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:20:26PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > Our cache-to-cache tool noticed the slowdown but we couldn't understand
> > > why because we had falsely assumed the memory was allocated on the local
> > > node but instead it was on the remote node.
> > But in general, you can never say for user memory, since that has the
> > process page table mapping in between, the user virtual address is
> > unrelated to backing (and can change frequently and without
> > notification).
> > Therefore the mmap(2) information is useless for this, it only concerns
> > user memory.
> So what you are saying is that it is difficult to have some sort of
> mechanism that an mmap moved from one node to another, when that
> happens, i.e. a new tracepoint for that?
Humm, so, after reading a bit more, I see that we can figure out which
ranges are in which NUMA nodes (like shown in dmesg), and we have the
phys addr, so is this just a matter of perf tooling complement the
information the kernel provides on mmap2 (and the hardware provides on
those events)?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists