[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1414002190.30946.95.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:23:10 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@...il.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-audit@...hat.com,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry()
interface
That's really serious. Looking now.
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:08 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
>
> (Cc'ing everybody mentioned in the original patch)
>
> I work for Intel, on our Linux Graphics driver - aka i915.ko - and our
> QA team recently reported a regression on:
>
> commit b4f0d3755c5e9cc86292d5fd78261903b4f23d4a
> Author: Richard Guy Briggs
> Date: Tue Mar 4 10:38:06 2014 -0500
> audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
>
> According to our QA, their i386 machine doesn't boot anymore. I tried
> to write my own revert for the patch, asked QA to test, and they
> confirmed it "solves" the problem.
>
> Here are the details of QA' s bug report:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 .
>
> The trees our QA tests are the development trees from i915.ko:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel?h=drm-intel-fixes .
>
> I tried searching for other bug reports on the same patch, but
> couldn't find any. Forgive me if this bug was already reported.
>
> Feel free to continue this discussion on the bugzilla report if you want.
>
> Thanks,
> Paulo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists