[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1564848.hByj3lEMqB@avalon>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:06:13 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Ténart <antoine@...e-electrons.com>,
lars@...afoo.de, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/59] dmaengine: Remove the need to declare device_control
Hi Maxime,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 17:43:23 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> In order to migrate the drivers without triggering a BUG_ON for the
> converted drivers, which would cause bisectability issues, we need to
> remove that check before removing the device_control function entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 9b2cd74b8f2e..98e9431f85ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -820,8 +820,6 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
> !device->device_prep_dma_sg);
> BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_CYCLIC, device->cap_mask) &&
> !device->device_prep_dma_cyclic);
> - BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_SLAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> - !device->device_control);
> BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> !device->device_prep_interleaved_dma);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists