| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1414044566.2031.1.camel@declera.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:09:26 +0300
From: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@...lera.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: localed stuck in recent 3.18 git in copy_net_ns?
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > > Don't get me wrong -- the fact that this kthread appears to
> > > > have
> > > > blocked within rcu_barrier() for 120 seconds means that
> > > > something is
> > > > most definitely wrong here. I am surprised that there are no
> > > > RCU CPU
> > > > stall warnings, but perhaps the blockage is in the callback
> > > > execution
> > > > rather than grace-period completion. Or something is
> > > > preventing this
> > > > kthread from starting up after the wake-up callback executes.
> > > > Or...
> > > >
> > > > Is this thing reproducible?
> > >
> > > I've added Yanko on CC, who reported the backtrace above and can
> > > recreate it reliably. Apparently reverting the RCU merge commit
> > > (d6dd50e) and rebuilding the latest after that does not show the
> > > issue. I'll let Yanko explain more and answer any questions you
> > > have.
> >
> > - It is reproducible
> > - I've done another build here to double check and its definitely
> > the rcu merge
> > that's causing it.
> >
> > Don't think I'll be able to dig deeper, but I can do testing if
> > needed.
>
> Please! Does the following patch help?
Nope, doesn't seem to make a difference to the modprobe ppp_generic
test
INFO: task kworker/u16:6:101 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Not tainted 3.18.0-0.rc1.git2.3.fc22.x86_64 #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
message.
kworker/u16:6 D ffff88022067cec0 11680 101 2 0x00000000
Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
ffff8802206939e8 0000000000000096 ffff88022067cec0 00000000001d5f00
ffff880220693fd8 00000000001d5f00 ffff880223263480 ffff88022067cec0
ffffffff82c51d60 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff81ee2698 ffffffff81ee2690
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8185e289>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[<ffffffff818634ac>] schedule_timeout+0x26c/0x410
[<ffffffff81028c4a>] ? native_sched_clock+0x2a/0xa0
[<ffffffff81107afc>] ? mark_held_locks+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81864530>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[<ffffffff81107c8d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x15d/0x200
[<ffffffff8185fcbc>] wait_for_completion+0x10c/0x150
[<ffffffff810e5430>] ? wake_up_state+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffff8112a799>] _rcu_barrier+0x159/0x200
[<ffffffff8112a895>] rcu_barrier+0x15/0x20
[<ffffffff81718f0f>] netdev_run_todo+0x6f/0x310
[<ffffffff8170dad5>] ? rollback_registered_many+0x265/0x2e0
[<ffffffff81725f7e>] rtnl_unlock+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff8170f936>] default_device_exit_batch+0x156/0x180
[<ffffffff810fd8f0>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xb0/0xb0
[<ffffffff817079e3>] ops_exit_list.isra.1+0x53/0x60
[<ffffffff81708590>] cleanup_net+0x100/0x1f0
[<ffffffff810ccff8>] process_one_work+0x218/0x850
[<ffffffff810ccf5f>] ? process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
[<ffffffff810cd717>] ? worker_thread+0xe7/0x4a0
[<ffffffff810cd69b>] worker_thread+0x6b/0x4a0
[<ffffffff810cd630>] ? process_one_work+0x850/0x850
[<ffffffff810d39eb>] kthread+0x10b/0x130
[<ffffffff81028cc9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff810d38e0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
[<ffffffff8186527c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff810d38e0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
4 locks held by kworker/u16:6/101:
#0: ("%s""netns"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ccf5f>] process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
#1: (net_cleanup_work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810ccf5f>] process_one_work+0x17f/0x850
#2: (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8170851c>] cleanup_net+0x8c/0x1f0
#3: (rcu_sched_state.barrier_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8112a675>] _rcu_barrier+0x35/0x200
INFO: task modprobe:1139 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Not tainted 3.18.0-0.rc1.git2.3.fc22.x86_64 #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
message.
modprobe D ffff880213ac1a40 13112 1139 1138 0x00000080
ffff880036ab3be8 0000000000000096 ffff880213ac1a40 00000000001d5f00
ffff880036ab3fd8 00000000001d5f00 ffff880223264ec0 ffff880213ac1a40
ffff880213ac1a40 ffffffff81f8fb48 0000000000000246 ffff880213ac1a40
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8185e831>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x31/0x80
[<ffffffff81860083>] mutex_lock_nested+0x183/0x440
[<ffffffff817083af>] ? register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[<ffffffff817083af>] ? register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[<ffffffffa06f3000>] ? 0xffffffffa06f3000
[<ffffffff817083af>] register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
[<ffffffffa06f3048>] br_init+0x48/0xd3 [bridge]
[<ffffffff81002148>] do_one_initcall+0xd8/0x210
[<ffffffff81153c52>] load_module+0x20c2/0x2870
[<ffffffff8114ec30>] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70
[<ffffffff8110ac76>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x3c6/0x3d0
[<ffffffff811544e7>] SyS_init_module+0xe7/0x140
[<ffffffff81865329>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
1 lock held by modprobe/1139:
#0: (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff817083af>]
register_pernet_subsys+0x1f/0x50
INFO: task modprobe:1209 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Not tainted 3.18.0-0.rc1.git2.3.fc22.x86_64 #1
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
message.
modprobe D ffff8800c5324ec0 13368 1209 1151 0x00000080
ffff88020d14bbe8 0000000000000096 ffff8800c5324ec0 00000000001d5f00
ffff88020d14bfd8 00000000001d5f00 ffff880223280000 ffff8800c5324ec0
ffff8800c5324ec0 ffffffff81f8fb48 0000000000000246 ffff8800c5324ec0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8185e831>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x31/0x80
[<ffffffff81860083>] mutex_lock_nested+0x183/0x440
[<ffffffff817083fd>] ? register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
[<ffffffff817083fd>] ? register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
[<ffffffffa070f000>] ? 0xffffffffa070f000
[<ffffffff817083fd>] register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
[<ffffffffa070f020>] ppp_init+0x20/0x1000 [ppp_generic]
[<ffffffff81002148>] do_one_initcall+0xd8/0x210
[<ffffffff81153c52>] load_module+0x20c2/0x2870
[<ffffffff8114ec30>] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70
[<ffffffff8110ac76>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x3c6/0x3d0
[<ffffffff811544e7>] SyS_init_module+0xe7/0x140
[<ffffffff81865329>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
1 lock held by modprobe/1209:
#0: (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff817083fd>] register_pernet_device+0x1d/0x70
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
> rcu: More on deadlock between CPU hotplug and expedited grace periods
>
> Commit dd56af42bd82 (rcu: Eliminate deadlock between CPU hotplug and
> expedited grace periods) was incomplete. Although it did eliminate
> deadlocks involving synchronize_sched_expedited()'s acquisition of
> cpu_hotplug.lock via get_online_cpus(), it did nothing about the
> similar
> deadlock involving acquisition of this same lock via
> put_online_cpus().
> This deadlock became apparent with testing involving hibernation.
>
> This commit therefore changes put_online_cpus() acquisition of this
> lock
> to be conditional, and increments a new cpu_hotplug.puts_pending
> field
> in case of acquisition failure. Then cpu_hotplug_begin() checks for
> this
> new field being non-zero, and applies any changes to
> cpu_hotplug.refcount.
>
> Reported-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 356450f09c1f..90a3d017b90c 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ static struct {
> * an ongoing cpu hotplug operation.
> */
> int refcount;
> + /* And allows lockless put_online_cpus(). */
> + atomic_t puts_pending;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> struct lockdep_map dep_map;
> @@ -113,7 +115,11 @@ void put_online_cpus(void)
> {
> if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
> return;
> - mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> + if (!mutex_trylock(&cpu_hotplug.lock)) {
> + atomic_inc(&cpu_hotplug.puts_pending);
> + cpuhp_lock_release();
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (WARN_ON(!cpu_hotplug.refcount))
> cpu_hotplug.refcount++; /* try to fix things up */
> @@ -155,6 +161,12 @@ void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
> cpuhp_lock_acquire();
> for (;;) {
> mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> + if (atomic_read(&cpu_hotplug.puts_pending)) {
> + int delta;
> +
> + delta = atomic_xchg(&cpu_hotplug.puts_pending, 0);
> + cpu_hotplug.refcount -= delta;
> + }
> if (likely(!cpu_hotplug.refcount))
> break;
> __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists