lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:02:21 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	PERIER Romain <romain.perier@...il.com>
Cc:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, "pawel.moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	galak <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	swarren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"thierry.reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	gnurou <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: tps65910: Convert ti,system-power-controller
 DT property to poweroff-source

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote:

> 2014-10-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote:
> >
> >> This is related to the following subject "[RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add
> >> standard property for poweroff capability" and depends on the
> >> corresponding patch.
> >
> > Then it should be sent in the same patch-set.
> >
> > There's nothing I can do with this patch as is.
> >
> 
> Even if this patch is already commited and present in "linux-next" ?
> (or in Mark Brown's regulator tree)

Usually it wouldn't be possible to take this, as it would be
difficult to ensure bisectability.  The way we usually deal with this
is to have a shared immutable branch between the effected subsystems,
but we can only do this if the patches are sent as a set.  However, it
appears as though Mark has "of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability" on a tagged branch on its own.  This means, after checking
with Mark that this branch in indeed stable, I can merge it in and
base this commit on top of it.  Not many people setup their repos like
Mark does, so I guess you are lucky this time.

Once I've heard back from Mark, I'll let you know when I apply the
patch.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists