[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141023130103.GC3729@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:01:03 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Gyungoh Yoo <gyungoh@...il.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org, jg1.han@...sung.com,
cooloney@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, jack.yoo@...worksinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
pawel.moll@....com, heiko@...ech.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
shawn.guo@...escale.com, treding@...dia.com,
florian.vaussard@...l.ch, trivial@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
andrew@...n.ch, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT PATCH v4 7/8] regulator: sky81452: Add compatible
string for device binding
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:14:43PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> So, what do you think about DT like below?
> sky81452@2c {
> compatible = "skyworks,sky81452";
> reg = <0x2c>;
>
> backlight {
> compatible = "skyworks,sky81452-backlight";
> name = "pwm-backlight";
> enable = <0x3F>;
> ignore-pwm;
> };
>
> regulator {
> compatible = "skyworks,sky81452-regulator";
Yes, this is good but I still feel that the above compatible is
redundant and shouildn't be there.
> lout@0 {
> regulator-name = "LOUT";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <4500000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <8000000>;
> };
> };
> };
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists