[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141023154007.GA21034@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:40:07 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima: check xattr value length in ima_inode_setxattr()
On Thu 23-10-14 16:47:17, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> ima_inode_setxattr() can be called with no value. Function does not
> check the length so that following command can be used to produce
> kernel oops: setfattr -n security.ima FOO. This patch fixes it.
>
..
>
> Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index 5b845af..f07aacd 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
> xattr_value_len);
> if (result == 1) {
> + if (!xattr_value_len)
> + return -EINVAL;
Wouldn't it be safer to return EINVAL whenever xattr_value_len !=
sizeof(evm_ima_xattr_data)?
Honza
> ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode,
> (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) ? 1 : 0);
> result = 0;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists