[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <863134949.204101414024143724.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas06c>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:29:05 +0000 (GMT)
From: Eunbong Song <eunb.song@...sung.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: "ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] mips: add arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() function
>> This patch adds arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() for mips architecture.
> Don't forget your Signed-off-by
I'm sorry fot this.
>> +static void arch_dump_stack(void *info)
>> +{
>> + struct pt_regs *regs;
>> +
>> + regs = get_irq_regs();
>> +
>> + if(regs)
>> + show_regs(regs);
>> +
>> + dump_stack();
>> +}
>> +
>> +void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool include_self)
>> +{
>> + smp_call_function(arch_dump_stack, NULL, 1);
> should this call arch_dump_stack directly too if include_self?
Currently, in case of mips there is no case include_self is true, so this is not a problem.
arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace can only be called from trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace() in kernel/watchdog.c.
But as you said, if the case will be added, we should consider that.
Thanks.
> Cheers
> James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists