linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] ipmi: Setup ipmi_devintf automatically if ipmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1414147256.8113.41.camel@pdbcooper.pdb.fsc.net>
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:40:56 +0200
From:	"Wilck, Martin" <martin.wilck@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"trenn@...e.de" <trenn@...e.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"minyard@....org" <minyard@....org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] ipmi: Setup ipmi_devintf automatically if
 ipmi_msghandler gets loaded

Thomas,

> > I vote for MODULE_SOFTDEP for upstream, and modalias for distros that
> > don't support MODULE_SOFTDEP yet.
> I vote for ipmi_msghandler.c renaming into ipmi_handler.c

sorry, I am not with you here. This is a small problem that should be
handled with small effort. Why apply a 3-part patch set for a problem
that can be solved with 2 modalias lines in user space?

Martin