[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141024130320.GA14687@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:03:20 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] perf pmu: Let pmu's with no events show up on perf
list
Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:57:02AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:15:52PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:45:10 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > + if (pmu->selectable) {
> > > + scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s//", pmu->name);
> > > + aliases[j] = strdup(buf);
> >
> > You need to check the return value here (and above too).
>
> Well spotted, fixing this up.
Oh well, this print_pmu_events() function needs some care, it starts by
trying to alloc the array, if it fails, it silently returns, does that
mean that there are no pmu events? Or that memory allocation failed?
Ok, will do the fixes in a separate patch...
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists