[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164441414171122@web11g.yandex.ru>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:18:42 +0400
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Burke Libbey <burke.libbey@...pify.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: reset sched_entity depth on changing parent
24.10.2014, 19:58, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:07:46AM -0400, Burke Libbey wrote:
>> From 2014-02-15: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/15/217
>>
>> This issue was reported and patched, but it still occurs in some situations on
>> newer kernel versions.
>>
>> [2249353.328452] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000150
>> [2249353.336528] IP: [<ffffffff810b1cf7>] check_preempt_wakeup+0xe7/0x210
>>
>> se.parent gets out of sync with se.depth, causing a panic when the algorithm in
>> find_matching_se assumes they are correct. This patch forces se.depth to be
>> updated every time se.parent is, so they can no longer become desync'd.
>>
>> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Burke Libbey <burke.libbey@...pify.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I haven't been able to isolate the problem. Though I'm pretty confident this
>> fixes the issue I've been having, I have not been able to prove it.
>
> So this isn't correct, switching rq should not change depth. I suspect
> you're just papering over the issue by frequently resetting the value,
> which simply narrows the race window.
Just a hypothesis.
I was seeking a places where task_group of a task may change. I can't understand
how changing of parent's cgroup during fork() applies to a child.
Child's cgroup is the same as parent's after dup_task_struct(). The only function
changing task_group is sched_move_task(), but we do not call it between
dup_task_struct() and wake_up_new_task(). Shouldn't we do something like this?
(compile tested only)
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index cc18694..0ccbbdb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7833,6 +7833,11 @@ static void cpu_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
sched_offline_group(tg);
}
+static void cpu_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ sched_move_task(task);
+}
+
static int cpu_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
@@ -8205,6 +8210,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys cpu_cgrp_subsys = {
.css_free = cpu_cgroup_css_free,
.css_online = cpu_cgroup_css_online,
.css_offline = cpu_cgroup_css_offline,
+ .fork = cpu_cgroup_fork,
.can_attach = cpu_cgroup_can_attach,
.attach = cpu_cgroup_attach,
.exit = cpu_cgroup_exit,
Or we just should set tsk->sched_task_group?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists