[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000101cff035$d9f50480$8ddf0d80$%yang@samsung.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:26:31 +0800
From: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>
To: 'Minchan Kim' <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Dan Streetman' <ddstreet@...e.org>,
'Sergey Senozhatsky' <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
'Nitin Gupta' <ngupta@...are.org>,
'Linux-MM' <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
'linux-kernel' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Weijie Yang' <weijie.yang.kh@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] zram: avoid NULL pointer access when reading mem_used_total
There is a rare NULL pointer bug in mem_used_total_show() in concurrent
situation, like this:
zram is not initialized, process A is a mem_used_total reader which runs
periodicity, while process B try to init zram.
process A process B
access meta, get a NULL value
init zram, done
init_done() is true
access meta->mem_pool, get a NULL pointer BUG
This patch fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 64dd79a..2ffd7d8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -99,11 +99,12 @@ static ssize_t mem_used_total_show(struct device *dev,
{
u64 val = 0;
struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
- struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
down_read(&zram->init_lock);
- if (init_done(zram))
+ if (init_done(zram)) {
+ struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
val = zs_get_total_pages(meta->mem_pool);
+ }
up_read(&zram->init_lock);
return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", val << PAGE_SHIFT);
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists