[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410252136220.5308@nanos>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:42:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
Phong Vo <pvo@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@....com>, Y Vo <yvo@....com>,
Toan Le <toanle@....com>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] genirq: Allow the irqchip state of an IRQ to be
save/restored
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Bah, hit send way too fast :)
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > +int irq_get_irqchip_state(unsigned int irq, int state)
get_state(state) does not make sense. get_state(which) probably more
so. And 'which' wants to be an enum btw.
> > + chip_bus_lock(desc);
> > + val = chip->irq_get_irqchip_state(data, state);
>
> Hmm. What's the irq_get_irqchip_state() callback supposed to return?
Either an error code or a boolean value, right? Does not mix very well
I think.
int irq_get_irqchip_state(unsigned int irq, enum xxx which, bool *val)
Might be a more clear interface.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists