[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1414235215-10468-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:06:53 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] genirq: Add support for priority-drop/deactivate interrupt controllers
Moderately recent ARM interrupt controllers can use a "split mode" EOI,
where instead of just using a single write to notify the controller of
the end of interrupt, uses the following:
- priority-drop: the interrupt is still active, but other interrupts can
now be taken
- deactivate: the interrupt is not active anymore, and can be taken again.
This makes it very useful for threaded interrupts, as it avoids the usual
mask/unmask dance (and has the potential of being more efficient on ARM,
as it is using the CPU interface instead of the global distributor).
To implement this, a new optional irqchip method is added (irq_priority_drop).
The usual irq_eoi is expected to implement the deactivate method.
Non threaded interrupts are using these two callbacks back to back, but threaded
ones only perform the irq_priority_drop call in the interrupt context, leaving
the irq_eoi call to the thread context (which are expected to use the
IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
---
include/linux/irq.h | 1 +
kernel/irq/chip.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
index 257d59a..64d3756 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ struct irq_chip {
void (*irq_mask)(struct irq_data *data);
void (*irq_mask_ack)(struct irq_data *data);
void (*irq_unmask)(struct irq_data *data);
+ void (*irq_priority_drop)(struct irq_data *data);
void (*irq_eoi)(struct irq_data *data);
int (*irq_set_affinity)(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *dest, bool force);
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index e5202f0..cf9d001 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -272,12 +272,25 @@ void mask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
}
}
+static void mask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
+
+ /* If we can do priority drop, then masking comes for free */
+ if (chip->irq_priority_drop)
+ irq_state_set_masked(desc);
+ else
+ mask_irq(desc);
+}
+
void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_unmask) {
- desc->irq_data.chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
+ struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
+
+ if (chip->irq_unmask && !chip->irq_priority_drop)
+ chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
+ if (chip->irq_unmask || chip->irq_priority_drop)
irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
- }
}
void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
@@ -287,10 +300,7 @@ void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
if (chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)
chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
- if (chip->irq_unmask) {
- chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
- irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
- }
+ unmask_irq(desc);
}
/*
@@ -470,12 +480,24 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
#endif
+static void eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irq_chip *chip)
+{
+ if (chip->irq_priority_drop)
+ chip->irq_priority_drop(&desc->irq_data);
+ if (chip->irq_eoi)
+ chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+}
+
static void cond_unmask_eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irq_chip *chip)
{
if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)) {
- chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+ eoi_irq(desc, chip);
return;
}
+
+ if (chip->irq_priority_drop)
+ chip->irq_priority_drop(&desc->irq_data);
+
/*
* We need to unmask in the following cases:
* - Oneshot irq which did not wake the thread (caused by a
@@ -485,7 +507,8 @@ static void cond_unmask_eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irq_chip *chip)
if (!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data) && !desc->threads_oneshot) {
chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
- unmask_irq(desc);
+ if (!chip->irq_priority_drop)
+ unmask_irq(desc);
} else if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)) {
chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
}
@@ -525,7 +548,7 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
}
if (desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)
- mask_irq(desc);
+ mask_threaded_irq(desc);
preflow_handler(desc);
handle_irq_event(desc);
@@ -536,7 +559,7 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
return;
out:
if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
- chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+ eoi_irq(desc, chip);
raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_fasteoi_irq);
@@ -655,7 +678,7 @@ void handle_edge_eoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data));
out_eoi:
- chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+ eoi_irq(desc, chip);
raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
}
#endif
@@ -679,8 +702,7 @@ handle_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
handle_irq_event_percpu(desc, desc->action);
- if (chip->irq_eoi)
- chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+ eoi_irq(desc, chip);
}
/**
@@ -711,8 +733,7 @@ void handle_percpu_devid_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
res = action->handler(irq, dev_id);
trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
- if (chip->irq_eoi)
- chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
+ eoi_irq(desc, chip);
}
void
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists