[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544BDD2E.6010604@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:26:06 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] net: dsa: Add support for hardware monitoring
On 10/25/14 07:01, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Here is another naming option:
>>
>> em1dsa0-virtual-0
>
> I prefer this over isa.
>
> However, i think there should be some sort of separator between the
> network device name and dsa.
Considering that network devices can be renamed, do we want it to be
included in the sensor name at all?
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists