[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410272137140.5308@nanos>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:38:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Ren, Qiaowei" <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 10/12] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT,
PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-10-24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> >> +int mpx_enable_management(struct task_struct *tsk) {
> >> + struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
> >> + void __user *bd_base = MPX_INVALID_BOUNDS_DIR;
> >
> > What's the point of initializing bd_base here. I had to look twice to
> > figure out that it gets overwritten by task_get_bounds_dir()
> >
>
> I just want to put task_get_bounds_dir() outside mm->mmap_sem holding.
What you want is not interesting at all. What's interesting is what
you do and what you send for review.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists