[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141027074419.GE10501@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:44:19 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org >> Linux PM list"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] PM / Sleep: Timer quiesce in freeze state
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:27:27PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >> +static void freezer_suspend_tk(int cpu)
> >> {
> >> + if (tick_do_timer_cpu != cpu)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >
> > I had a note here that this might be broken for clocksource drivers that
> > have suspend/resume methods. You seem to have 'lost' that note, is that
> > because you found it isn't a problem?
> >
> I don't see it's a problem as long as we do not refer the clock source
> before it resumes. But I think my testing didn't cover that case that
> clock source drivers have suspend/resume methods. Can you please give
> more details what do you worry about?
I can't seem to recall :/ Maybe I conflated clocksource and clockevents
and figured we'd need to run the clocksource suspend callback on each
cpu.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists