[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141027092317.GC10867@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:17 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@...wei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched:skip loop non-idle cpus after find an idle cpu
while find_idlest_cpu
* Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@...wei.com> [2014-10-27 16:58:05]:
> On 2014/10/27 16:04, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@...wei.com> [2014-10-27 11:13:17]:
> >
> >> Idle cpu is idler than non-idle cpu, so we needn't loop non-idle cpus after find an idle cpu.
> >>
> > While this check looks good,
> > I dont see how we are avoiding a loop?
> >
> > Are you suggesting that we break of the for loop once we set
> > shallowest_idle_cpu?
> >
> Thanks for your review.
>
> I agree that the submit message is a bit misleading, what this patch do is just avoiding search for least_loaded_cpu
> in non-idle cpus.
>
> sched:add check of shallowest_idle_cpu before search for least_loaded_cpu
>
> Idle cpu is idler than non-idle cpu, so we needn't search for least_loaded_cpu
> after we have found an idle cpu.
>
Looks good for me.
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists