lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544E1206.3050802@kapsi.fi>
Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:36:06 +0200
From:	Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>
To:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org
CC:	swarren@...dotorg.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, gnurou@...il.com,
	pdeschrijver@...dia.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, mturquette@...aro.org,
	pwalmsley@...dia.com, vinceh@...dia.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	tuomas.tynkkynen@....fi, Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/16] clk: tegra: Add library for the DFLL clock source
 (open-loop mode)

On 10/24/2014 06:08 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hello Mikko,

Hello Vladimir!

>
> On 24.10.2014 17:39, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>> From: Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
>>
>> Add shared code to support the Tegra DFLL clocksource in open-loop
>> mode. This root clocksource is present on the Tegra124 SoCs. The
>> DFLL is the intended primary clock source for the fast CPU cluster.
>>
>> This code is very closely based on a patch by Paul Walmsley from
>> December (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/15273),
>> which in turn comes from the internal driver by originally created
>> by Aleksandr Frid <afrid@...dia.com>.
>>
>> Subsequent patches will add support for closed loop mode and drivers
>> for the Tegra124 fast CPU cluster DFLL devices, which rely on this
>> code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>
>> ---
>> - Style fixes
>> - Removed incorrect and unused DFLL_I2C_CFG_SLAVE_ADDR_MASK define
>> - Documented that dfll_register_clk can return -ENOMEM
>> - Harmonized clock operation order
>> - Check !soc before allocating
>> - Comment fixes
>>
>>   drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile   |    1 +
>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.c | 1090 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.h |   55 +++
>>   3 files changed, 1146 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile b/drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile
>> index f7dfb72..47320ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/Makefile
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>   obj-y					+= clk.o
>>   obj-y					+= clk-audio-sync.o
>> +obj-y					+= clk-dfll.o
>>   obj-y					+= clk-divider.o
>>   obj-y					+= clk-periph.o
>>   obj-y					+= clk-periph-gate.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..405fa9d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-dfll.c
>
> [snip]
>
>> +/*
>> + * Runtime PM suspend/resume callbacks
>> + */
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * tegra_dfll_runtime_resume - enable all clocks needed by the DFLL
>> + * @dev: DFLL device *
>> + *
>> + * Enable all clocks needed by the DFLL. Assumes that clk_prepare()
>> + * has already been called on all the clocks.
>> + *
>> + * XXX Should also handle context restore when returning from off.
>> + */
>> +int tegra_dfll_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct tegra_dfll *td = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_enable(td->ref_clk);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "could not enable ref clock: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_enable(td->soc_clk);
>> +	if (ret) {
>
> What is the correct behaviour on error? Should you fallback and try to
> enable td->i2c_clk clock or may be disable right enabled above td->ref_clk?

This should probably error out and disable the previously enabled 
clock/clocks. Will fix.

>
>> +		dev_err(dev, "could not enable register clock: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_enable(td->i2c_clk);
>> +	if (ret) {
>
> See the comment above.
>
>> +		dev_err(dev, "could not enable i2c clock: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tegra_dfll_runtime_resume);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * tegra_dfll_runtime_suspend - disable all clocks needed by the DFLL
>> + * @dev: DFLL device *
>> + *
>> + * Disable all clocks needed by the DFLL. Assumes that other code
>> + * will later call clk_unprepare().
>> + */
>> +int tegra_dfll_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct tegra_dfll *td = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +	clk_disable(td->ref_clk);
>> +	clk_disable(td->soc_clk);
>> +	clk_disable(td->i2c_clk);
>
> Relevant to the comment above.
>
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tegra_dfll_runtime_suspend);
>> +
>
> [snip]
>
>> +/**
>> + * dfll_register_clk - register the DFLL output clock with the clock framework
>> + * @td: DFLL instance
>> + *
>> + * Register the DFLL's output clock with the Linux clock framework and register
>> + * the DFLL driver as an OF clock provider. Returns 0 upon success or -EINVAL
>> + * or -ENOMEM upon failure.
>> + */
>> +static int dfll_register_clk(struct tegra_dfll *td)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	dfll_clk_init_data.name = td->output_clock_name;
>> +	td->dfll_clk_hw.init = &dfll_clk_init_data;
>> +
>> +	td->dfll_clk = clk_register(td->dev, &td->dfll_clk_hw);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(td->dfll_clk)) {
>> +		dev_err(td->dev, "DFLL clock registration error\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = of_clk_add_provider(td->dev->of_node, of_clk_src_simple_get,
>> +				  td->dfll_clk);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(td->dev, "of_clk_add_provider() failed\n");
>> +		goto out_unregister_clk;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +out_unregister_clk:
>> +	clk_unregister(td->dfll_clk);
>
> ---8<---
> 	if (ret) {
> 		dev_err(td->dev, "of_clk_add_provider() failed\n");
> 		clk_unregister(td->dfll_clk);
> 	}
> ---8<---
>
> version is 5 lines and one label less.

Will fix.

>
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>
> [snip]
>
>> +/**
>> + * read_dt_param - helper function for reading required parameters from the DT
>> + * @td: DFLL instance
>> + * @param: DT property name
>> + * @dest: output pointer for the value read
>> + *
>> + * Read a required numeric parameter from the DFLL device node, or complain
>> + * if the property doesn't exist. Returns a boolean indicating success for
>> + * easy chaining of multiple calls to this function.
>> + */
>> +static bool read_dt_param(struct tegra_dfll *td, const char *param, u32 *dest)
>> +{
>> +	int err = of_property_read_u32(td->dev->of_node, param, dest);
>> +
>> +	if (err < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(td->dev, "failed to read DT parameter %s: %d\n",
>> +			param, err);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>
> ^^^^ Relatively useless wrapper function used only once. You are anyway
> going to check the return value again...

As you noted, this will be used more later.

>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dfll_fetch_common_params - read DFLL parameters from the device tree
>> + * @td: DFLL instance
>> + *
>> + * Read all the DT parameters that are common to both I2C and PWM operation.
>> + * Returns 0 on success or -EINVAL on any failure.
>> + */
>> +static int dfll_fetch_common_params(struct tegra_dfll *td)
>> +{
>> +	bool ok = true;
>> +
>> +	ok &= read_dt_param(td, "nvidia,droop-ctrl", &td->droop_ctrl);
>
> See the comment above.
>
>> +	if (of_property_read_string(td->dev->of_node, "clock-output-names",
>> +				    &td->output_clock_name)) {
>> +		dev_err(td->dev, "missing clock-output-names property\n");
>> +		ok = false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ok ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>> +}
>
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir
>

Thanks for reviewing!

Cheers,
Mikko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ