[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wq7lpx55.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 04:31:02 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8 only] x86,vdso: Use LSL unconditionally for vgetcpu
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> writes:
> LSL is faster than RDTSCP and works everywhere; there's no need to
> switch between them depending on CPU.
Yes it should have been done like this from day 1.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c b/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
> index 9793322751e0..d14bb8faad16 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
> * Check with readelf after changing.
> */
>
> +/* Disable static_cpu_has debugging; it doesn't work in the vDSO */
> +#undef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_STATIC_CPU_HAS
> +
> #include <uapi/linux/time.h>
> #include <asm/vgtod.h>
> #include <asm/hpet.h>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/vdso/vgetcpu.c b/arch/x86/vdso/vgetcpu.c
> index add1d98d2477..fd8470c98ab5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/vdso/vgetcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/vdso/vgetcpu.c
> @@ -5,10 +5,12 @@
> * Fast user context implementation of getcpu()
> */
>
> +/* Disable static_cpu_has debugging; it doesn't work in the vDSO */
> +#undef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_STATIC_CPU_HAS
These two hunks are unrelated?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists