[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5394.1414418718@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:05:18 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Locking problem in overlayfs
Using my testsuite, I see the attached moan from lockdep. Unfortunately, it
doesn't cause the testsuite to actually fail, so I'm going to have to manually
try and isolate the failing test.
David
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.18.0-rc2-fsdevel+ #910 Tainted: G W
---------------------------------------------
run/2642 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81203d81>] ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113abff>] lock_rename+0xb7/0xd7
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by run/2642:
#0: (sb_writers#15){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8114a1e2>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x46
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#17/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113c737>] do_rmdir+0xa9/0x165
#2: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#17){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113c0ad>] vfs_rmdir+0x5a/0x115
#3: (sb_writers#8){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8114a1e2>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x46
#4: (&type->s_vfs_rename_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113ab88>] lock_rename+0x40/0xd7
#5: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113abff>] lock_rename+0xb7/0xd7
#6: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113ac15>] lock_rename+0xcd/0xd7
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 2642 Comm: run Tainted: G W 3.18.0-rc2-fsdevel+ #910
Hardware name: /DG965RY, BIOS MQ96510J.86A.0816.2006.0716.2308 07/16/2006
ffffffff823989e0 ffff880038d8fa68 ffffffff815222f2 0000000000000006
ffffffff823989e0 ffff880038d8fb38 ffffffff810738f4 000000000000000b
ffff880037ebc710 ffff880038d8fb00 ffff880037ebcf58 0000000000000005
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff815222f2>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
[<ffffffff810738f4>] __lock_acquire+0x7b5/0x1a17
[<ffffffff8107522d>] lock_acquire+0xa3/0x11d
[<ffffffff81203d81>] ? ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
[<ffffffff8111ff14>] ? kfree+0x17e/0x1ca
[<ffffffff8152580a>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x304
[<ffffffff81203d81>] ? ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
[<ffffffff81139123>] ? vfs_rename+0x602/0x689
[<ffffffff81203d81>] ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
[<ffffffff81202252>] ovl_clear_empty+0x195/0x216
[<ffffffff81202315>] ovl_check_empty_and_clear+0x42/0x5d
[<ffffffff81056944>] ? creds_are_invalid+0x17/0x4a
[<ffffffff81202a19>] ovl_do_remove+0x189/0x36a
[<ffffffff81202c0b>] ovl_rmdir+0x11/0x13
[<ffffffff8113c0f2>] vfs_rmdir+0x9f/0x115
[<ffffffff8113c784>] do_rmdir+0xf6/0x165
[<ffffffff8100d224>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x4a/0x4c
[<ffffffff8100e43f>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase2+0x178/0x1c1
[<ffffffff810e5aae>] ? context_tracking_user_exit+0x54/0xce
[<ffffffff8113d007>] SyS_rmdir+0x11/0x13
[<ffffffff81528a09>] tracesys_phase2+0xd4/0xd9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists