linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: socfpga: fpga bridges bindings docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <09D1D469-01B8-44BD-BC18-EB879297BB85@konsulko.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:21:22 +0200
From:	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
	atull@...nsource.altera.com, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
	hpa@...or.com, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	michal.simek@...inx.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, iws@...o.caltech.edu,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
	philip@...ister.org, rubini@...dd.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
	kyle.teske@...com, nico@...aro.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	m.chehab@...sung.com, davidb@...eaurora.org,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
	cesarb@...arb.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	mgerlach@...nsource.altera.com,
	Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
	dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com, yvanderv@...nsource.altera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: socfpga: fpga bridges bindings docs

Hi Mark,

> On Oct 27, 2014, at 19:17 , Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:45:03PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> 
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap at less than 80 columns.
> 
>> Well, it’s not my speciality, but my understanding is that FPGAs take (considerable)
>> time to be programmed. If someone has already configured the ‘bus’ it is considered
>> a win to not reload the bitstream. I.e. if you boot with the bootloader having loaded
>> the bitstream already, you don’t want to do it again.
> 
> That's not what your property is saying, though - if it were just about
> handover between the bootloader and the kernel that'd be one thing but
> it's also got this additional possibility to instruct the kernel that
> the device must be either disabled or explicitly programmed.  Having a
> property that just says "this FPGA is programmed" covers the handover
> case but this property does more than that.

It’s not my property. This is not my driver. The property is badly-named
as it is IMHO.

Why don’t we let Alan chime in?

Regards

— Pantelis

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/