[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544E821D.5040004@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:34:21 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Jan Kardell <jan.kardell@...liq.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Brad Griffis <bgriffis@...com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Touchscreen performance related fixes
On 10/27/2014 12:08 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> This series of patches fix TSC defects related to lag in touchscreen
I will try to look this in the next few days. Do we really need #3 (and
then #4)? Given the complexity we have already, is there any benefit by
decreasing this value? Would someone want to increase it? Can we safely
determine a value which works for everyone?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists