lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:57:19 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 104/105] x86,kvm,vmx: Preserve CR4 across VM entry

3.13.11.10 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>

commit d974baa398f34393db76be45f7d4d04fbdbb4a0a upstream.

CR4 isn't constant; at least the TSD and PCE bits can vary.

TBH, treating CR0 and CR3 as constant scares me a bit, too, but it looks
like it's correct.

This adds a branch and a read from cr4 to each vm entry.  Because it is
extremely likely that consecutive entries into the same vcpu will have
the same host cr4 value, this fixes up the vmcs instead of restoring cr4
after the fact.  A subsequent patch will add a kernel-wide cr4 shadow,
reducing the overhead in the common case to just two memory reads and a
branch.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 31c3e8b..c11b1ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
 #endif
 		int           gs_ldt_reload_needed;
 		int           fs_reload_needed;
+		unsigned long vmcs_host_cr4;	/* May not match real cr4 */
 	} host_state;
 	struct {
 		int vm86_active;
@@ -4131,11 +4132,16 @@ static void vmx_set_constant_host_state(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	u32 low32, high32;
 	unsigned long tmpl;
 	struct desc_ptr dt;
+	unsigned long cr4;
 
 	vmcs_writel(HOST_CR0, read_cr0() & ~X86_CR0_TS);  /* 22.2.3 */
-	vmcs_writel(HOST_CR4, read_cr4());  /* 22.2.3, 22.2.5 */
 	vmcs_writel(HOST_CR3, read_cr3());  /* 22.2.3  FIXME: shadow tables */
 
+	/* Save the most likely value for this task's CR4 in the VMCS. */
+	cr4 = read_cr4();
+	vmcs_writel(HOST_CR4, cr4);			/* 22.2.3, 22.2.5 */
+	vmx->host_state.vmcs_host_cr4 = cr4;
+
 	vmcs_write16(HOST_CS_SELECTOR, __KERNEL_CS);  /* 22.2.4 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	/*
@@ -7140,7 +7146,7 @@ static void atomic_switch_perf_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
-	unsigned long debugctlmsr;
+	unsigned long debugctlmsr, cr4;
 
 	/* Record the guest's net vcpu time for enforced NMI injections. */
 	if (unlikely(!cpu_has_virtual_nmis() && vmx->soft_vnmi_blocked))
@@ -7161,6 +7167,12 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (test_bit(VCPU_REGS_RIP, (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.regs_dirty))
 		vmcs_writel(GUEST_RIP, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RIP]);
 
+	cr4 = read_cr4();
+	if (unlikely(cr4 != vmx->host_state.vmcs_host_cr4)) {
+		vmcs_writel(HOST_CR4, cr4);
+		vmx->host_state.vmcs_host_cr4 = cr4;
+	}
+
 	/* When single-stepping over STI and MOV SS, we must clear the
 	 * corresponding interruptibility bits in the guest state. Otherwise
 	 * vmentry fails as it then expects bit 14 (BS) in pending debug
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ