linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] ARM: at91: Remove mach/ includes from the reset driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141028091124.GC31979@lukather>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:11:24 +0100
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] ARM: at91: Remove mach/ includes from the reset
 driver

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:04:55AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > I'd rather keep the reset driver as is and move SDRAM related macros
> > > > into a specific header (include/linux/memory/atmel-sdram.h or
> > > > include/soc/atmel/memory.h as you proposed) so that the reset driver
> > > > can reference them without including mach headers.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > My personal opinion is that it is better to hide the registers/bits from
> > > the reset driver right now as we have two different IPs and the sdram
> > > driver already knows how to make the difference between them.
> > 
> > The reset driver doesn't do anything anymore with these patches. Why
> > not just remove it altogether?
> > 
> 
> It does, the reset driver knows about the reset registers.

So the only thing it does it to define a few register and that's it?
It looks like it's a case for a header, not a driver.

> The plan is to move the actual reset back to that driver when the
> kernel will be able to easily execute code from sram.

Why not go directly for the plan then?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)