[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-64be6f1f5f710f5995d41caf8a1767fe6d2b5a87@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:01:49 -0700
From: tip-bot for Juri Lelli <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
raistlin@...ux.it, juri.lelli@....com, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, daniel.wagner@...-carit.de, fchecconi@...il.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Don'
t replenish from a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity
Commit-ID: 64be6f1f5f710f5995d41caf8a1767fe6d2b5a87
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/64be6f1f5f710f5995d41caf8a1767fe6d2b5a87
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:16:37 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:46:00 +0100
sched/deadline: Don't replenish from a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity
In the deboost path, right after the dl_boosted flag has been
reset, we can currently end up replenishing using -deadline
parameters of a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity. This of course causes
a bug, as those parameters are empty.
In the case depicted above it is safe to simply bail out, as
the deboosted task is going to be back to its original scheduling
class anyway.
Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: vincent@...out.info
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414142198-18552-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 256e577..92279ea 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -847,8 +847,19 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
* smaller than our one... OTW we keep our runtime and
* deadline.
*/
- if (pi_task && p->dl.dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio))
+ if (pi_task && p->dl.dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio)) {
pi_se = &pi_task->dl;
+ } else if (!dl_prio(p->normal_prio)) {
+ /*
+ * Special case in which we have a !SCHED_DEADLINE task
+ * that is going to be deboosted, but exceedes its
+ * runtime while doing so. No point in replenishing
+ * it, as it's going to return back to its original
+ * scheduling class after this.
+ */
+ BUG_ON(!p->dl.dl_boosted || flags != ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
+ return;
+ }
/*
* If p is throttled, we do nothing. In fact, if it exhausted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists