[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-3c9b2c3d64a49f264422d7743599cf7f6535972d@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:11:24 -0700
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, fengguang.wu@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched, modules:
Fix nested sleep in add_unformed_module()
Commit-ID: 3c9b2c3d64a49f264422d7743599cf7f6535972d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3c9b2c3d64a49f264422d7743599cf7f6535972d
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:18:53 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:56:30 +0100
sched, modules: Fix nested sleep in add_unformed_module()
This is a genuine bug in add_unformed_module(), we cannot use blocking
primitives inside a wait loop.
So rewrite the wait_event_interruptible() usage to use the fresh
wait_woken() stuff.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: ilya.dryomov@...tank.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140924082242.458562904@infradead.org
[ So this is probably complex to backport and the race wasn't reported AFAIK,
so not marked for -stable. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/module.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 88cec1d..e52a873 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -3097,6 +3097,32 @@ static int may_init_module(void)
}
/*
+ * Can't use wait_event_interruptible() because our condition
+ * 'finished_loading()' contains a blocking primitive itself (mutex_lock).
+ */
+static int wait_finished_loading(struct module *mod)
+{
+ DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ add_wait_queue(&module_wq, &wait);
+ for (;;) {
+ if (finished_loading(mod->name))
+ break;
+
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ }
+ remove_wait_queue(&module_wq, &wait);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
* We try to place it in the list now to make sure it's unique before
* we dedicate too many resources. In particular, temporary percpu
* memory exhaustion.
@@ -3116,8 +3142,8 @@ again:
|| old->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED) {
/* Wait in case it fails to load. */
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
- err = wait_event_interruptible(module_wq,
- finished_loading(mod->name));
+
+ err = wait_finished_loading(mod);
if (err)
goto out_unlocked;
goto again;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists