[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028121636.GC3274@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 05:16:36 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
jason.wessel@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] kernel, add bug_on_warn
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> There have been several times where I have had to rebuild a kernel to
> cause a panic when hitting a WARN() in the code in order to get a crash
> dump from a system. Sometimes this is easy to do, other times (such as
> in the case of a remote admin) it is not trivial to send new images to the
> user.
>
> A much easier method would be a switch to change the WARN() over to a
> BUG(). This makes debugging easier in that I can now test the actual
> image the WARN() was seen on and I do not have to engage in remote
> debugging.
IMHO this would be better and far more generically done with kdb.
You would need two things:
- Extend the break point command to run another command on a break point.
- Add a command line (or possibly /proc) option to execute some kdb commands at
kernel boot.
Then just set a break point on the warn function and execute magic sysrq c
from kdb.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists