linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 005/127] Btrfs: dont do async reclaim during log replay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141028033421.163297378@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:34:00 +0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 005/127] Btrfs: dont do async reclaim during log replay

3.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>

commit f6acfd50110b335c7af636cf1fc8e55319cae5fc upstream.

Trying to reproduce a log enospc bug I hit a panic in the async reclaim code
during log replay.  This is because we use fs_info->fs_root as our root for
shrinking and such.  Technically we can use whatever root we want, but let's
just not allow async reclaim while we're doing log replay.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4508,7 +4508,13 @@ again:
 		space_info->flush = 1;
 	} else if (!ret && space_info->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) {
 		used += orig_bytes;
-		if (need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, root->fs_info, used) &&
+		/*
+		 * We will do the space reservation dance during log replay,
+		 * which means we won't have fs_info->fs_root set, so don't do
+		 * the async reclaim as we will panic.
+		 */
+		if (!root->fs_info->log_root_recovering &&
+		    need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, root->fs_info, used) &&
 		    !work_busy(&root->fs_info->async_reclaim_work))
 			queue_work(system_unbound_wq,
 				   &root->fs_info->async_reclaim_work);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/