linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/29] nios2: I/O Mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3089586.phhm8NvmXk@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:30:25 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, lftan.linux@...il.com,
	cltang@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/29] nios2: I/O Mapping

On Friday 24 October 2014 16:24:09 Ley Foon Tan wrote:

> +/* PCI is not supported in nios2, set this to 0. */
> +#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0
> +
> +extern void outsb(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len);
> +extern void outsw(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len);
> +extern void outsl(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len);
> +extern void insb(unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len);
> +extern void insw(unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len);
> +extern void insl(unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len);
> +#define outsb outsb
> +#define outsw outsw
> +#define outsl outsl
> +#define insb insb
> +#define insw insw
> +#define insl insl

You don't have inb/outb, so you shouldn't have these either.

> +/*
> + * PCI is not enabled in nios2. Provide dummy implementation to get 'allyesconfig'
> + * to build successfully.
> + */
> +#define inb(addr)	({ 0; })
> +#define inw(addr)	({ 0; })
> +#define inl(addr)	({ 0; })
> +#define outb(x, addr)	do { } while (0)
> +#define outw(x, addr)	do { } while (0)
> +#define outl(x, addr)	do { } while (0)

What fails if you take these out?

> +
> +/* Use "Duff's Device" to unroll the loops. */
> +#define __IO_OUT_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		if (l > 0) {				\
> +			int _n = (l + 7) / 8;		\
> +			switch (l % 8) {		\
> +			case 0:				\
> +				do {			\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 7:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 6:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 5:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 4:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 3:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 2:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +			case 1:				\
> +					*a = *b++;	\
> +				} while (--_n > 0);	\
> +			}				\
> +		}					\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define __IO_IN_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		if (l > 0) {				\
> +			int _n = (l + 7) / 8;		\
> +			switch (l % 8) {		\
> +			case 0:				\
> +				do {			\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 7:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 6:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 5:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 4:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 3:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 2:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +			case 1:				\
> +					*b++ = *a;	\
> +				} while (--_n > 0);	\
> +			}				\
> +		}					\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#else /* __IO_USE_DUFFS */
> +
> +/* Use simple loops. */
> +#define __IO_OUT_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		while (l--)				\
> +			*a = *b++;			\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define __IO_IN_LOOP(a, b, l)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		while (l--)				\
> +			*b++ = *a;			\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#endif /* __IO_USE_DUFFS */
> +
> +void outsb(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	volatile unsigned char *ap = (volatile unsigned char *)addr;
> +	unsigned char *bp = (unsigned char *)buf;
> +	__IO_OUT_LOOP(ap, bp, len);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(outsb);
> +
> +void outsw(unsigned long addr, const void *buf, int len)
> +{
> +	volatile unsigned short *ap = (volatile unsigned short *)addr;
> +	unsigned short *bp = (unsigned short *)buf;
> +	__IO_OUT_LOOP(ap, bp, len);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(outsw);

This implementation makes no sense, so definitely remove them.


	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/