lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028133856.GB8123@saruman>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:38:56 -0500
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jason Chang <jason.chang@....com>,
	Vincent Wan <vincent.wan@....com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] usb: dwc3: add support for AMD NL platform

Hi,

almost there...

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:54:40PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> index 8b94ad5..b08a2f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
> @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ struct dwc3_scratchpad_array {
>   * @rx_detect_poll_quirk: set if we enable rx_detect to polling lfps quirk
>   * @dis_u3_susphy_quirk: set if we disable usb3 suspend phy
>   * @dis_u2_susphy_quirk: set if we disable usb2 suspend phy
> + * @amd_nl_plat: set if we use AMD NL platform

however, as I mentioned before, the core shouldn't have to know that
it's running on an AMD platform. We already support several different
platforms (OMAP5, AM437x, DRA7xx, Exynos5, Exynos7, Qcom, Merrifield,
Baytrail, Braswell, HAPS PCIe, and STiH407) and none of them get their
$my_awesome_platform flag in dwc3, why should AMD be any different ?

This is the only part of $subject that I cannot accept because it would
mean we would be giving AMD a special treatment when there shouldn't be
any, for anybody.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ