[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544F9EAA.5010404@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:48:26 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CMA: test_pages_isolated failures in alloc_contig_range
[ +cc Andrew Morton ]
On 10/28/2014 08:38 AM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26 2014, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've run into a CMA-related issue while testing a DMA engine driver with
>> dmatest on a Renesas R-Car ARM platform.
>>
>> When allocating contiguous memory through CMA the kernel prints the following
>> messages to the kernel log.
>>
>> [ 99.770000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
>> [ 124.220000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
>> [ 127.550000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b845, 6b846) failed
>> [ 132.850000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b845, 6b846) failed
>> [ 151.390000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
>> [ 166.490000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b843, 6b844) failed
>> [ 181.450000] alloc_contig_range test_pages_isolated(6b845, 6b846) failed
>>
>> I've stripped the dmatest module down as much as possible to remove any
>> hardware dependencies and came up with the following implementation.
>
> Like Laura wrote, the message is not (should not be) a problem in
> itself:
[...]
> So as you can see cma_alloc will try another part of the cma region if
> test_pages_isolated fails.
>
> Obviously, if CMA region is fragmented or there's enough space for only
> one allocation of required size isolation failures will cause allocation
> failures, so it's best to avoid them, but they are not always avoidable.
>
> To debug you would probably want to add more debug information about the
> page (i.e. data from struct page) that failed isolation after the
> pr_warn in alloc_contig_range.
If the message does not indicate an actual problem, then its printk level is
too high. These messages have been reported when using 3.16+ distro kernels.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists