[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028144249.GD8123@saruman>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:42:49 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: baytrail: show output gpio state correctly on
Intel Baytrail
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:15:20AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:26:32PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > I also noticed that this is missing:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > index e12e5b0..7db5ab9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> > @@ -614,3 +614,9 @@ static int __init byt_gpio_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > subsys_initcall(byt_gpio_init);
> > +
> > +static void __exit byt_gpio_exit(void)
> > +{
> > + platform_driver_unregister(&byt_gpio_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(byt_gpio_exit);
>
> But the Baytrail driver is not a loadable module, it is bool:
>
> config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL
> bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
> depends on GPIOLIB && ACPI && X86
>
> (...)
>
> So I guess it won't need handling for removal, as it can only
> be compiled-in.
you can still unbind it through sysfs, right ? The thing also already
provides a ->remove() method anyway.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists