[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxGZHzOq260=JbZOFP10=aDwhi6G9O+jaA8tM4_c2-t=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:18:39 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] zap_pte_range: fix partial TLB flushing in
response to a dirty pte
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> @@ -1194,11 +1194,10 @@ again:
> * then update the range to be the remaining
> * TLB range.
> */
> - old_end = tlb->end;
> - tlb->end = addr;
> + tlb->end = old_end = min(tlb->end, addr);
> tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
> - tlb->start = addr;
> - tlb->end = old_end;
> + tlb->start = old_end;
> + tlb->end = end;
I don't think this is right. Setting "tlb->end = end" looks very wrong
indeed, because "end" here inside zap_pte_range() is *not* the final
end of the zap range, it is just the end of the current set of pte's.
There's a reason the old code *saved* the old end value. You've now
ripped that out, and use the "old_end" for something else entirely.
Your arm64 version of tlb_add_flush() then hides the bug you just
introduced by updating the end range for each page you encounter. But
quite frankly, I think your problems are all fundamental to that very
issue. You're playing games with start/end during the TLB flush
itself, which is not how those things were designed to work.
So now you break everything that *doesn't* do your arm games.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists