lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda7g7mZoTmHUWoLFaNmMYDShceJ=Gch8UQJ8sTJ+57ydw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:33:53 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: bindings: pinctrl: document the
 generic groups property

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Antoine Tenart
> <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
>> Group-based drivers use a groups property to define on which groups a
>> mux function is applied to. Document it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
>
> This is already documented but under another heading.
>
> This section was to be for pin config, we now have a separate
> section for pin muxing.

Bah rather, look in the upstream kernel:

== Generic pin multiplexing node content ==

pin multiplexing nodes:

function                - the mux function to select
groups                  - the list of groups to select with this function

Example:

state_0_node_a {
        function = "uart0";
        groups = "u0rxtx", "u0rtscts";
};
state_1_node_a {
        function = "spi0";
        groups = "spi0pins";
};

== Generic pin configuration node content ==

(...)

Supported generic properties are:

pins                    - the list of pins that properties in the node
                          apply to (either this or "group" has to be
                          specified)
group                   - the group to apply the properties to, if the driver
                          supports configuration of whole groups rather than
                          individual pins (either this or "pins" has to be
                          specified)


So now the first one is explicitly for mux and the latter on explicitly for
configs.

Maybe we have to have "pins" for the mux too, for drivers that do
per-pin function assignment, but it's clear that configs are per-pin
or per-group atleast, while muxing is done in nodes that contain
a "function" element.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ