[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c465a69d1c6e48bca66cc29a1692c13a@BL2FFO11FD015.protection.gbl>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:14:35 -0700
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/8] pinctrl: Add driver for Zynq
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 03:53PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Soren Brinkmann
> <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
> > ---
> > changes since RFC:
> > - use syscon/regmap to access registers in SLCR space
> > - add pinctrl to zc702 DT
> > - rebase to 3.18: rename enable -> set_mux
> > - add kernel-doc
> > - support pinconf
> > - supported attributes
> > - pin-bias: pull up, tristate, disable
> > - slew-rate: 0 == slow, 1 == fast; generic pinconf does not display
> > argument
>
> Great progress!!
Thans.
>
> (...)
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARCH_ZYNQ
> > select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
> > select ICST
> > select MFD_SYSCON
> > + select PINCTRL
>
> Don't you also want to select PINCTRL_ZYNQ or is it
> really optional?
Yep, you're right. I did some testing and it is required. I already have
that included in my work tree.
>
> > select SOC_BUS
> > help
> > Support for Xilinx Zynq ARM Cortex A9 Platform
>
> Please split these machine changes into a separate patch. It is hitting
> a totally different subsystem.
OK
>
> (...)
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
> (...)
> > +static const struct pinctrl_ops zynq_pctrl_ops = {
> > + .get_groups_count = zynq_pctrl_get_groups_count,
> > + .get_group_name = zynq_pctrl_get_group_name,
> > + .get_group_pins = zynq_pctrl_get_group_pins,
> > + .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_group,
> > + .dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_dt_free_map
> > +};
>
> Nice use of generic functions!
Yeah, but for it to really work I need the changes I made to
pinconf-generic. Otherwise things just don't work well since I would
only be able to either select pin groups or pins in DT.
>
> > +static int zynq_pinconf_cfg_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> > + unsigned pin,
> > + unsigned long *config)
> > +{
> > + u32 reg;
> > + int ret;
> > + unsigned int arg = 0;
> > + unsigned int param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
> > + struct zynq_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> > +
> > + if (pin > 53)
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> 53 looks a bit magical? #define or comment here to explain what's
> going on?
Yep, I'll add something like ZYNQ_NUM_MIOS
>
> Apart from these small things this looks like merge material.
That is good to hear, thank you. But before merging this the
pinconf-generic changes need to go through. Even though I didn't order
things that way in this series (I wanted to show how my work proceeded),
proper operation depends of the driver depends on those pinconf-generic
changes.
Thanks,
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists