[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028163733.GA6480@Asurada>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:37:34 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Add reg_defaults for regmap to fix
kernel dump
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:47:42AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:26:26PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:19:04AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > It's not a bug, it's not reasonable to default allocations to atomic and
> > > we can't really tell what context we're in. Anything used inside a
> > > heavily locked path should either have a default provided or arrange for
> > > a prior write to set up the cache.
>
> > I've a little trouble to understand the prior write over here. Inside my
> > probe() there's a register_init() call which has a set of regmap_write().
> > And then the first regmap_write() results the dump. Does that mean this
> > regmap_write() isn't prior write? If so, how should I do if not setting
>
> Oh, bother. We fixed things so that we're now always running with the
> spinlock held... never mind.
Okay...so only one choice left.
> > default values here -- Some IPs may have default value 0 for registers.
> > And this would make reg_defaults tedious since there's nothing special
> > to assign.
>
> Write a small script then, or a little bit of code to create the
> defaults dynamically.
It actually doesn't bother me at all. I just thought there might be
a simpler way. :)
Thank you
Nicolin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists