linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86: Make page cache mode a real type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410281536170.5308@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:05:34 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
cc:	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	stefan.bader@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	jbeulich@...e.com, toshi.kani@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86: Make page cache mode a real type

On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Juergen Gross wrote:
> At the moment there are a lot of places that handle setting or getting
> the page cache mode by treating the pgprot bits equal to the cache mode.
> This is only true because there are a lot of assumptions about the setup
> of the PAT MSR. Otherwise the cache type needs to get translated into
> pgprot bits and vice versa.
> 
> This patch tries to prepare for that by introducing a separate type
> for the cache mode and adding functions to translate between those and
> pgprot values.
> 
> To avoid too much performance penalty the translation between cache mode
> and pgprot values is done via tables which contain the relevant
> information.  Write-back cache mode is hard-wired to be 0, all other
> modes are configurable via those tables. For large pages there are
> translation functions as the PAT bit is located at different positions
> in the ptes of 4k and large pages.

I'm fine with the approach itself. Though I wish you had split this
patch in several sanely to review pieces.

  - Introduce enums, helper functions etc. which basically reflect
    the state of today

  - Change the usage sites to use the enums and helpers

  - Convert the enum/helper implementation to the new scheme

  - Split out the printk change

  ...

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/