[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028172234.GA12775@sudip-PC>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:52:34 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] block: wrong return value
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:16:48PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> while compiling integer err was showing as a set but unused variable.
> elevator_init_fn can be either cfq_init_queue or deadline_init_queue
> or noop_init_queue.
> all three of these functions are returning -ENOMEM if they fail to
> allocate the queue.
> so we should actually be returning the error code rather than
> returning 0 always.
i have one doubt. shouldn't this patch be marked for stable also?
thanks
sudip
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> ---
>
> change in v2: added elevator_put
> change in v3: remove unneeded initialization of err
>
> block/elevator.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index 24c28b6..afa3b03 100644
> --- a/block/elevator.c
> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ int elevator_init(struct request_queue *q, char *name)
> }
>
> err = e->ops.elevator_init_fn(q, e);
> - return 0;
> + if (err)
> + elevator_put(e);
> + return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(elevator_init);
>
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists