linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] umount.2: Correct the description of MNT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:31:51 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	"Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] umount.2: Correct the description of MNT_DETACH

"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm still hoping for a revised patch from you in the light
> of Andy's comments and question.

Andy's concerns are orthogonal to my original patch, and
actually have nothing to do with MNT_DETACH.

Which was my point but here I will send a second patch on top of my
first patch to document the effect of shared mounts in umount.2

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/