[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r3xscd88.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:31:51 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] umount.2: Correct the description of MNT_DETACH
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm still hoping for a revised patch from you in the light
> of Andy's comments and question.
Andy's concerns are orthogonal to my original patch, and
actually have nothing to do with MNT_DETACH.
Which was my point but here I will send a second patch on top of my
first patch to document the effect of shared mounts in umount.2
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists