[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1414517881.10912.2.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:38:01 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] docg3: Fix miuse of seq_printf return value
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:27:40 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 12:05 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I would like to get this done before I do my merge of trace_seq and
> > > seq_file, but I'm thinking I may have to do that in parallel.
> >
> > I think the most important thing is to get the
> > seq_is_overflown (or seq_has_overflowed or whatever
> > other name is chosen) function added then the rest
> > of the patches can be applied whenever maintainers
> > (or Andrew or trivial or ...) pick them up.
>
> I can get that in without much of an issue. But the merge of trace_seq
> and seq_file would be easier if I didn't have to worry about return
> values. Which is why I want to get this in quickly.
What is the issue there?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists