[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <544FE032.5050900@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 19:28:02 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@...il.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
patches@...aro.org, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state
selection failed
On 10/28/2014 08:01 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>> In the current code, the check to reflect or not the outcoming state is done
>> against the idle state which has been chosen and its value.
>>
>> Instead of doing a check in each of the reflect functions, just don't call reflect
>> if something went wrong in the idle path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 4 +---
>> kernel/sched/idle.c | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> index fb396d6..c0b36a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>> @@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static int ladder_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> static void ladder_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> struct ladder_device *ldev = &__get_cpu_var(ladder_devices);
>> - if (index > 0)
>> - ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>> + ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>> }
>>
>> static struct cpuidle_governor ladder_governor = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> index a17515f..3907301 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> @@ -365,9 +365,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
>> - data->last_state_idx = index;
>> - if (index >= 0)
>> - data->needs_update = 1;
>> + data->needs_update = 1;
>
> Why is the last_state_idx not getting updated ?
Oups, right. This is missing.
Thanks for pointing this out.
By the way, I don't think a back end driver is changing the selected
state currently and I am not sure this is desirable since we want to
trust the state we are going (as a best effort). So if the 'enter'
function does not change the index, that means the last_state_idx has
not to be changed since it has been assigned in the 'select' function.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists