[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx_-nGxD0kkzmGrGKB_nnEEVEPt-31SA9uO3f0cOTTHVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:32:57 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] zap_pte_range: update addr when forcing flush
after TLB batching faiure
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> Can't you just do a full invalidate and a SW IPI for larger ranges?
>
> For us, this would be great except ... we can potentially have other
> agents with an MMU that only support snooping of the broadcasts...
Ugh. Oh well. I guess on power you need to walk all the hashed entries
individually _anyway_, so there's no way you could really use a
range-based or "invalidate all" model to avoid some of the work.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists