linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1414533217-24910-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:53:31 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_pending()

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Because rcu_pending()'s argument is guaranteed to always be the current
CPU, drop the argument and replace per_cpu_ptr() with this_cpu_ptr().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3107811bba69..0670ba3a65d3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 				  unsigned long *maxj),
 			 bool *isidle, unsigned long *maxj);
 static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
-static int rcu_pending(int cpu);
+static int rcu_pending(void);
 
 /*
  * Return the number of RCU-sched batches processed thus far for debug & stats.
@@ -2421,7 +2421,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
 		rcu_bh_qs();
 	}
 	rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(smp_processor_id());
-	if (rcu_pending(smp_processor_id()))
+	if (rcu_pending())
 		invoke_rcu_core();
 	if (user)
 		rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
@@ -3144,12 +3144,12 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
  * by the current CPU, returning 1 if so.  This function is part of the
  * RCU implementation; it is -not- an exported member of the RCU API.
  */
-static int rcu_pending(int cpu)
+static int rcu_pending(void)
 {
 	struct rcu_state *rsp;
 
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
-		if (__rcu_pending(rsp, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu)))
+		if (__rcu_pending(rsp, this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)))
 			return 1;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/