lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:53:33 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu: Remove "cpu" argument to rcu_note_context_switch()

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

The "cpu" argument to rcu_note_context_switch() is always the current
CPU, so drop it.  This in turn allows the "cpu" argument to
rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() to be removed, which allows the sole
use of "cpu" in both functions to be replaced with a this_cpu_ptr().
Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been
replaced by NO_HZ_FULL.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcutiny.h  | 2 +-
 include/linux/rcutree.h  | 4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tree.h        | 2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 6 +++---
 kernel/sched/core.c      | 2 +-
 kernel/softirq.c         | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 38cc5b1e252d..0e5366200154 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
 	call_rcu(head, func);
 }
 
-static inline void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+static inline void rcu_note_context_switch(void)
 {
 	rcu_sched_qs();
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 3e2f5d432743..7b5484db1857 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 #ifndef __LINUX_RCUTREE_H
 #define __LINUX_RCUTREE_H
 
-void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu);
+void rcu_note_context_switch(void);
 #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
 int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *delta_jiffies);
 #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void rcu_cpu_stall_reset(void);
  */
 static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
 {
-	rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
+	rcu_note_context_switch();
 }
 
 void synchronize_rcu_bh(void);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 1af5e2cdcbeb..b591f1459240 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -286,11 +286,11 @@ static void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void)
  * and requires special handling for preemptible RCU.
  * The caller must have disabled preemption.
  */
-void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+void rcu_note_context_switch(void)
 {
 	trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start context switch"));
 	rcu_sched_qs();
-	rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(cpu);
+	rcu_preempt_note_context_switch();
 	if (unlikely(raw_cpu_read(rcu_sched_qs_mask)))
 		rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
 	trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End context switch"));
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 94a26e330c1b..238ac39053fc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(char, rcu_cpu_has_work);
 /* Forward declarations for rcutree_plugin.h */
 static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
 long rcu_batches_completed(void);
-static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu);
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void);
 static int rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 7158814b7b4a..495d4cce47a7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(void)
  *
  * Caller must disable preemption.
  */
-static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t = current;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
 	    !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked) {
 
 		/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
-		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda, cpu);
+		rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda);
 		rnp = rdp->mynode;
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
 		smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_batches_completed);
  * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
  * CPUs being in quiescent states.
  */
-static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
 {
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 44999505e1bf..cc186945296d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2802,7 +2802,7 @@ need_resched:
 	preempt_disable();
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
-	rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
+	rcu_note_context_switch();
 	prev = rq->curr;
 
 	schedule_debug(prev);
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 0699add19164..501baa9ac1be 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu)
 		 * in the task stack here.
 		 */
 		__do_softirq();
-		rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
+		rcu_note_context_switch();
 		local_irq_enable();
 		cond_resched();
 		return;
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ