[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028051220.GE60814@vmdeb7>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:12:20 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] eeepc-laptop: define rfkill notifier nodes only once
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:12:38PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> The rfkill notifier node names are used in three different places. As a
> matter of style, it is better to store them somewhere and have the
> compiler warn us about typos in the function arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> index 6e3be01..e92ea41 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> @@ -819,11 +819,15 @@ static int eeepc_new_rfkill(struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static char EEEPC_RFKILL_NODE_1[] = "\\_SB.PCI0.P0P5";
> +static char EEEPC_RFKILL_NODE_2[] = "\\_SB.PCI0.P0P6";
> +static char EEEPC_RFKILL_NODE_3[] = "\\_SB.PCI0.P0P7";
So, out of curiosity, any particular reason for static char[] instead of
#define? I see both used frequently and didn't see any advice in CodingStyle.
Regardless, Queued and thanks,
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists